• Àüü
  • ÀüÀÚ/Àü±â
  • Åë½Å
  • ÄÄÇ»ÅÍ
´Ý±â

»çÀÌÆ®¸Ê

Loading..

Please wait....

±¹³» ³í¹®Áö

Ȩ Ȩ > ¿¬±¸¹®Çå > ±¹³» ³í¹®Áö > Çѱ¹Á¤º¸Ã³¸®ÇÐȸ ³í¹®Áö > Á¤º¸Ã³¸®ÇÐȸ ³í¹®Áö ¼ÒÇÁÆ®¿þ¾î ¹× µ¥ÀÌÅÍ °øÇÐ

Á¤º¸Ã³¸®ÇÐȸ ³í¹®Áö ¼ÒÇÁÆ®¿þ¾î ¹× µ¥ÀÌÅÍ °øÇÐ

Current Result Document :

ÇѱÛÁ¦¸ñ(Korean Title) Çѱ¹ÀÇ À¥ Á¢±Ù¼º Æò°¡ ¿¬±¸µ¿Ç⠺м®
¿µ¹®Á¦¸ñ(English Title) A Study on Recent Research Trend on Web Accessibility Evaluation in Korea
ÀúÀÚ(Author) ±è¹ÌÁ¤   ±èÀڹ̠  MiJeong Kim   JaMee Kim  
¿ø¹®¼ö·Ïó(Citation) VOL 07 NO. 01 PP. 0033 ~ 0042 (2018. 01)
Çѱ۳»¿ë
(Korean Abstract)
º» ¿¬±¸´Â ±¹³» À¥ Á¢±Ù¼º Æò°¡ ¿¬±¸µ¿ÇâÀ» ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿©, ºÎÁ·ÇÑ Á¡°ú À¥ Á¢±Ù¼º Æò°¡ ¿¬±¸°¡ ³ª¾Æ°¡¾ß ÇÒ ¹æÇ⼺À» Á¦½ÃÇϱâ À§ÇÑ ¸ñÀûÀ¸·Î ÁøÇàµÇ¾ú´Ù. ¸ñÀû ´Þ¼ºÀ» À§ÇØ 2000³â 1¿ùºÎÅÍ 2017³â 3¿ù±îÁö ¾à 17³â°£ Çѱ¹¿¬±¸Àç´Ü µîÀçÇмúÁö ¹× µîÀçÈĺ¸ ÇмúÁö¿¡ ¹ßÇ¥µÈ ³í¹®À» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ÃÑ 59ÆíÀ» ¼±Á¤ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¼±Á¤µÈ ³í¹®µéÀº À¥ Á¢±Ù¼º¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Æò°¡ÀÚ, Æò°¡ ´ë»ó, Æò°¡ ¹æ¹ý, Æò°¡ °á°úº°·Î ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ºÐ¼® °á°ú, Æò°¡ÀÚ Ãø¸éÀº ¡®´Üµ¶ Æò°¡(66%)¡¯°¡, Æò°¡ ´ë»óÀº ¡®À¥ »çÀÌÆ®(83%)¡¯°¡ °¡Àå ³ôÀº ºñÀ²À̾ú´Ù. Æò°¡ ¹æ¹ýÀº ÀÚµ¿Æò°¡, ÀÚµ¿°ú ¼öµ¿ º´ÇàÀÌ À¯»çÇÑ ºñÀ²À̾ú´Ù. ¸¶Áö¸·À¸·Î À¥ Á¢±Ù¼º ¹®Á¦¾øÀ½À» ³ªÅ¸³½ ³í¹®Àº ´Ü 2ÆíÀ̾ú´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸´Â Æò°¡ µ¿ÇâÀ» ºÐ¼®ÇÑ ¸ÞŸ ¿¬±¸°¡ ºÎÁ·ÇÑ »óÅ¿¡¼­ Çѱ¹ÀÇ À¥ Á¢±Ù¼º ¿¬±¸ ¹× À¥ Á¢±Ù¼º Æò°¡ ¿¬±¸ÀÇ ¹Ù¶÷Á÷ÇÑ ¹æÇ⼺À» Á¦¾ðÇß´Ù´Â µ¥ ÀÇÀÇ°¡ ÀÖ´Ù.
¿µ¹®³»¿ë
(English Abstract)
The purpose of this study is to suggest the shortcomings and the direction of the web accessibility evaluation studies by analyzing the research trends on web accessibility evaluation in Korea. For this aim, a total of 59 theses presented in the registered academic journal and the candidate of registration academic journals from January 2000 to March 2017 were selected. The selected dissertations have been analyzed based on the evaluators, the evaluation targets, the evaluation methods, and the evaluation results with regard to web accessibility. As a result of the analysis, the highest rate in the evaluator aspect was ¡®independent evaluation (66 percent)¡¯ and the highest percentage in the evaluation target aspect was ¡®web site (83 percent)¡¯. When it came to the evaluation methods, automatic evaluation and the mixture of automatic evaluation and manual evaluation had a similar percentage. Lastly, only two papers showed that web accessibility did not have any problems. This study is meaningful in the sense that it suggested a desirable direction for the web accessibility studies in Korea and web accessibility evaluation studies in the situation when the meta studies which analyzed research trends are insufficient.
Å°¿öµå(Keyword) À¥ Á¢±Ù¼º   À¥ Á¢±Ù¼º Æò°¡   ¿¬±¸µ¿Çâ   ¿¬±¸ ¹æÇ⼺   Web Accessibility   Web Accessibility Evaluation   Research Trends   Research Direction  
ÆÄÀÏ÷ºÎ PDF ´Ù¿î·Îµå